A horrific experiment on newborn puppies is the latest in a series of shocking findings to be uncovered by the New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society. Animal lovers around the world were outraged and appalled last year when the NZAVS exposed how researchers had used defenceless pound dogs for poisoning trials. The respected non-profit organisation then began a thorough investigation to find out as much as possible about how dogs are used in experiments in NZ. They never imagined just what they would find. Executive Director Tara Jackson shares how one experiment in particular on Huntaway puppies – a breed of loyal cattle dog – left her shaken.

‘The experiment we discovered was approved by Massey University in 2014 and involved repeated injections straight into the brains of 16 Huntaway puppies at intervals of weekly, fortnightly or monthly. Nine of the puppies received these intrusive, painful injections from birth. At the end of the experiment, 24 hours after their last injection, the puppies were all killed. It is unbelievable that New Zealand Animal Ethics Committees (AEC) are approving cruel experiments that involve the use of dogs, or any other sentient being. On every AEC there has to be an animal welfare representative, a vet and a member of the public not associated with the scientific community. How is it possible that experiments such as these are allowed to happen?’

A well hidden industry

Sourcing and uncovering information on this, and other experiments is far from easy, Tara explains. ‘While 2014 may seem like a long time ago, it is near impossible to find out about experiments that are happening right now. It’s difficult to find out about them at all to be honest, the industry is still very well hidden. Because the article does not state how the puppies were obtained or how they were housed, we have sent an Official Information Request to the University to find this information out. However, due to the multiple loopholes in the system, we may never find out’.

‘The thing is, not only is this experiment very cruel and unethical, it is also flawed. The researchers are trying to find a treatment for a complex human disease. The only viable way to find cures or treatments for a human disease, is to do human-relevant research. In this day and age, there are technologies available that could catapult us forward, advancing science at record speed. Instead, our welcome to these beautiful, intelligent beings was to use them as test subjects. They never made their first birthday on our planet; then again, perhaps life in a lab is not worth living’.

At the same time as exposing this experiment, the NZAVS also released the full findings from their investigation into the many different ways dogs are used in science and have launched a petition asking the NZ Government to make changes to the industry.

‘Using animals for science does not start in a lab. It is driven by a complicated web of factors. Funding and policy decisions are a major driver of animal experimentation. A lack of transparency and openness means the public rarely knows what is going on. And our laws are often weak and selectively enforced. To tackle these problems, we are going to the very source of the use of animals in science.’ says Tara.

The NZAVS is calling for as many people as possible to sign the petition, which demands:

Better allocation of funding

  • Funding for retraining scientists to use non-animal-based and human-relevant methods.
  • Funding for infrastructure for non-animal-based and human-relevant methods.
  • Prioritisation of funding for research using non-animal-based and human-relevant methods.
  • Prioritisation of funding for research to create non-animal-based and human-relevant methods.
  • Funding for universities to develop courses on non-animal-based and human-relevant methods.
  • Deprioritisation of funding for animal-based research.

Greater openness and transparency

  • Mandatory filming of experiments involving animals.
  • A registration programme for those providing animals for research.
  • Birth to end-of-research tracing and transparency, so it is clear for any given experiment where the animals came from and where they went after the research.
  • Greater transparency for existing documents, requiring their publication.
  • Publish all findings using animals to avoid unnecessary repetition.
  • Ensure private research conducted on animals is made public, to avoid unnecessary repetition.
  • Research conducted overseas for New Zealand companies should be subject to the same standards of openness and transparency.

Stronger laws

  • Government bodies commit to phasing out the use of animals in science as technology permits.
  • Phase-out all requirements for animal testing in New Zealand law.
  • Legislation amended to require that non-animal-based RTT methods be used over animal-based methods (alive or dead), where they exist.
  • An independent body for animal welfare, such as a Crown entity or commission.
  • A Minister for Animals separate from the Minister for Agriculture.
  • A comprehensive review of the efficacy of the animal model and the potential viability of non-animal-based methods as replacements.
  • Involvement of the public and advocacy groups like NZAVS in decision-making.
  • A requirement for all Animal Ethics Committees to have an expert on non-animal-based methods.
  • A requirement for all Animal Ethics Committees to make applications public.
  • A requirement for all Animal Ethics Committees to check for non-animal-based methods that may be able to replace animals when considering an application.
  • The establishment and maintenance of a database of non-animal-based methods, to aid Animal Ethics Committees.
  • The restructure of Animal Ethics Committees to minimise conflicts of interest. Scientists involved should not have a financial interest in animal-based-research – whether via employment or ownership of a company.
  • Sufficient funding for enforcement to ensure these objectives are met.

‘A group of people gave these barbaric tests their tick of approval’, says Tara. ‘The system is clearly broken and, in my opinion, it is set up to approve animal experimentation, rather than protect animals in any way. Serious (and well overdue) changes need to be made.

These puppies did not deserve a fate so cruel and so short. They did not deserve to be jabbed into their brains so many times. They did not deserve to die so young. They, and many others, need us to protect them.’

Help NZAVS create change for animals!

The New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society is NZ’s primary non-profit organisation defending animals used in science. To support their incredible and tireless work, please visit the following:

For news and updates: https://www.nzavs.org.nz
To make a donation: https://nzavs.infoodle.com/f/DonateFormStrikingAtTheSource
To sign the petition: https://our.actionstation.org.nz/petitions/demanding-action-against-animal-experimentation

Newborn Puppies Used in Horrific Brain ExperimentsNewborn Puppies Used in Horrific Brain Experiments
Vegan FTA's Jackie Norman is a freelance writer of more than 20 years, specialising in food, travel, simple living and vegan/environmental issues. An ex-beef and dairy farmer prior to going vegan, Jackie puts her years of experience to good use, by speaking out globally for the animals and opening the eyes of others to the horror and reality of the dairy and beef industries.